Skip to content
Log in Open an account
Cards
About us
News
Help
FAQ
Log in Open an account
Expense management

The receipt is easiest to capture in the minute it is handed over

Month-end expense reconstruction is not a discipline problem. It is a timing problem, and it disappears when the record is built at the moment of spending.

Back to News

Why it exists

The chase nobody signed up for

In most companies the expense process runs backwards. The spending happens over four weeks, and the record of it is assembled in the last two days of the month by somebody sending messages to colleagues about transactions they can no longer remember. Receipts have been lost, categories are guessed, and a spreadsheet exists that nobody wants to own.

This is usually treated as a compliance failure on the part of employees. It is more accurately a design failure. A paper receipt has a useful life of about a day in a coat pocket, and any process that depends on it surviving three weeks is going to fail at a predictable rate.

The cost is not only the finance team's time. Expenses that cannot be evidenced may not be deductible, and VAT that cannot be supported by a document is VAT that cannot be reclaimed. The missing receipt has a price, and it is paid by the company.

The change

Capture at the till, not at the deadline

Moving the capture to the moment of payment changes the failure rate rather than the rules. The person still has the receipt in their hand, the phone is already out because they have just been notified of the transaction, and the photograph takes a few seconds.

That is how expense management at Reibanq is built. Every card carries a name and a limit, the transaction reaches the account as it happens, and the notification is also the place where the receipt is attached. An expense with no document stays flagged, the person who made it is reminded, and the administrator can see what is outstanding without asking anybody. Reibanq accounts and cards run on payment services supplied and managed by Orenda FS B.V., and client funds are held separately from Reibanq's own money.

The categorisation follows the same principle. Each expense is filed against a category that matches the company's chart of accounts at the point of capture, which removes the renaming exercise that otherwise happens between the export and the ledger.

The handover

The export is where the saving is realised

Every expense tool produces a file. The difference between a useful one and a decorative one is whether the accountant can load it without editing it first.

A usable export contains four things: the amount and currency as charged, the date, the category as the company defines it, and the receipt attached to the line rather than supplied separately in a folder of images named by timestamp. When those four travel together in a standard format, posting is mechanical.

  • A standard file that accounting software can import, without a specific tool on the other side.
  • Receipts included with the transactions they belong to.
  • Categories that already match the chart of accounts.
  • One export across every card and every currency on the account.
Control

Who spends, who approves, who watches

Expense control is often described as a single thing when it is three. Setting a limit per person decides what can be spent. An approval step decides what is accepted. Visibility decides who can see either without asking.

Keeping them separate is what prevents an approval process from becoming a bottleneck. A limit set correctly means most transactions never need approving; approval can then be reserved for the categories or amounts where a second opinion genuinely adds something. A company that routes everything through sign-off usually ends up with sign-off that is not read.

Each card at Reibanq carries its own limit, so the control granularity is per person rather than per department, and adjusting a limit does not touch the main account. A physical card is a one-off EUR 2.00 on the Business plan, and free on Young Entrepreneurs.

Honestly

What better capture does not fix

Capturing expenses well makes the record accurate. It does not make the spending appropriate, and it will not settle a disagreement about whether a category of expense should exist at all. Those conversations get easier with good data and do not get resolved by it.

What does change immediately is the end of the month. When the record was built as the spending happened, closing is a review rather than an excavation, and the finance team spends the last two days of the month reading the numbers instead of assembling them.

Questions

What comes up when the process changes

What happens when a receipt is missing?

The expense stays flagged until a document is attached. The person who made it is reminded, and the administrator can see the outstanding items without asking anybody, which is the difference between a gap you know about and one you discover at year end.

Will the export work with my accountant's software?

The export uses a standard format that accounting software can import, so no particular tool is required on the other side. Receipts, categories and amounts arrive together rather than in separate places.

Do categories have to match our chart of accounts?

They should, and that is the point of setting them at capture. An expense filed under the company's own categories needs no renaming between the export and the ledger.

Is this a separate product from the account?

No. Cards, limits, receipts, categories and the export are part of the business account rather than a module bought on top of it.

See where the company's money goes

Cards, limits and receipts in one place, with the record built as the spending happens.